|
|
|
The discrepancy between
mid- and near infrared observations could be brought into accord if the 4.3
µm emissivity of the Moon was ~65% higher than that in the mid-infrared. This is, of course, at odds with the usual
assumption that the Moon is grey with an emissivity of 0.9. However, Murcray et al11
measured a wavelength dependent emissivity between 7 – 13.5 µm fpr six regions of the nearly
full during a balloon flight on 13 April 1868. Vogler et al.12
corrected the Murcray et al. results for the residual atmospheric absorption
above the balloon and found that the normalized emissivity varied from 90% at
13.5 µm to 105% at 7 µm. Murcray13
also observed a 30° latitudinal strip of the full Moon in September and
October 1964 in three spectral bands between 8.4 and 11 µm and determined
that the energy distribution was wider than a single temperature
blackbody. Vogler et al.12
inferred from these results that the partial disk integrated brightness
temperature of the full Moon has a mid-infrared slope of – 3K/µm. While it is perilous to extrapolate these
observations by a factor of two in wavelength and then to apply the results
to the eclipsed Moon, the observed trend is in the correct sense to account
for the 4.3 µm brightness temperature measurements.
|
|
______________________
|
|
11 Murcray,
F.H., D.G. Murcray and W.J. Williams 1970. Infrared emissivities of lunar
surface features. Balloon
observations, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 2662 –2669.
|
|
12Vogler,
K.J., P.E. Johnson and R.W. Shorthill 1991, Modeling the Non-Grey-Body
Thermal Emission From the Full Moon. Icarus 92, 80 – 93.
|
|
13Murcray,
F.H., 1965, The spectral dependence of lunar emissivity, J. Geophys. Res. 70,
4959 – 4962.
|