PDS_VERSION_ID = PDS3 RECORD_TYPE = STREAM OBJECT = TEXT PUBLICATION_DATE = 2007-07-31 NOTE = " E-mail and other messages concerning MGS Radio Science on or about 2001/107." END_OBJECT = TEXT END From ppriest@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Tue Apr 17 02:11 PDT 2001 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA06626; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 02:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id CAA06927; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 02:11:23 -0700 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma006871; Tue, 17 Apr 01 02:10:54 -0700 Received: from mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA15416; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 02:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ppriest@localhost) by mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id JAA18346; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:10:53 GMT Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:10:53 GMT From: Patricia Priest Message-Id: <200104170910.JAA18346@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> DSS: 65 Apparently-To: Apparently-To: Content-Type: text Content-Length: 573 Status: R Orbit: 9423i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/01:37:00 End Record: 107/01:44:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9424i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/03:35:00 End Record: 107/03:42:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9425i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/05:33:00 End Record: 107/05:40:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9426i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/07:31:00 End Record: 107/07:37:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ppriest@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Tue Apr 17 05:19 PDT 2001 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA06960; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 05:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id FAA24992; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 05:19:28 -0700 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma024964; Tue, 17 Apr 01 05:19:27 -0700 Received: from mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA17567; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 05:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ppriest@localhost) by mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id MAA18584; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:19:26 GMT Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:19:26 GMT From: Patricia Priest Message-Id: <200104171219.MAA18584@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> DSS: 15 Apparently-To: Apparently-To: Content-Type: text Content-Length: 285 Status: R Orbit: 9427i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/09:28:00 End Record: 107/09:35:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9428i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/11:26:00 End Record: 107/11:33:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ppriest@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Tue Apr 17 12:32 PDT 2001 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA14147; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id MAA21755; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:32:39 -0700 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma021378; Tue, 17 Apr 01 12:32:03 -0700 Received: from mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25080; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ppriest@localhost) by mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id TAA19083; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:32:02 GMT Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:32:02 GMT From: Patricia Priest Message-Id: <200104171932.TAA19083@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> DSS: 34 Apparently-To: Apparently-To: Content-Type: text Content-Length: 573 Status: RO Orbit: 9429i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/13:24:00 End Record: 107/13:31:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9430i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/15:22:00 End Record: 107/15:28:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9431i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/17:19:00 End Record: 107/17:26:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 9432i SOE: mm131a.04.tsoe Begin Record: 107/19:17:00 End Record: 107/19:24:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Elias.Barbinis@jpl.nasa.gov Tue Apr 17 13:28 PDT 2001 Received: from godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.120]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14332 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jpl.nasa.gov (eliasb.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.117]) by godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25346; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ADCA75D.850ACE15@jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:28:13 -0700 From: Elias Barbinis X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Twicken CC: aseel777@hotmail.com, Dick Simpson 723-3525 , Elias Barbinis Subject: 2001/107 at DSS34 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 194 Status: RO Hello Joe, 9429i, 9430i, 9431i, 9432i (over DSS34) are on the CDR. Tim left a note that he had to use station predicts for these measurements today. Regards, Elias -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From sami.asmar@jpl.nasa.gov Wed Apr 25 16:28 PDT 2001 Received: from eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov (eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.40]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17900 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmar-nt (asmar-nt.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.111]) by eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA17185; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010425162757.00c359b0@pop.jpl.nasa.gov> X-Sender: asmar@pop.jpl.nasa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:27:57 -0700 To: Frank Lemoine , rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu From: Sami Asmar Subject: Re: MGS Solar Array Patterns (fwd) Cc: dsmith@tharsis.gsfc.nasa.gov, dchinn@geodesy.gsfc.nasa.gov, flemoine@geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov In-Reply-To: <200104251516.PAA11501@geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 2348 Status: RO Frank, I just found out that there was a maneuver to move the solar panels on 17 April to reducse the exposure to the sun as there were getting too much solar power at this point. This was 25 degrees and it will stay there. These things are usually discussed in MCRs but I am always on distribution so I did not know about this in advance. Sami At 03:16 PM 4/25/2001 GMT, Frank Lemoine wrote: >Dick and Sami: > I forward to you the following message regarding the > MGS solar array quaternions. Apparently there was another > change in stepping algorithm on April 16? Are things > going to settle down? > The euler angles Doug refers to below are the euler angles > of the rotations that describe the orientation > of the SA+ array with respect to the spacecraft frame. > > > ->Frank L. >> >> Dear Frank, >> At the MGS radio science meeting on April 17, 2001, >> Sami said that the solar arrays would be following a 3 step >> pattern for the foreseeable future. This 3 step pattern >> began on April 1 00:00:00 UTC (without warning). The pattern >> seems to be having Euler angles 1 & 3 fixed with Euler angle 2 >> varying. 1 = 330.037200 deg, 3 = 0.0 deg (for the Yplus SA). >> The step plateaus for euler angle 2 are -69.9412 deg, -5.0358 deg, >> and +64.9614 deg. >> These plateaus alternate with an A B B repeating pattern from >> orbit to orbit where the transiton boundaries with respect to orbit angle >> are (approximately): >> >> Regime A Regime B >> -------- -------- >> 0.0 0.0 >> 46.0 33.5 >> 62.5 49.5 >> 113.0 100.5 >> 130.5 117.5 >> 237.0 279.5 >> 267.6 310.5 >> 360.0 360.0 >> >> This A B B pattern regularly repeats itself until about >> April 16, 2001 at 17:00:00. Then a new pattern appears, followed >> by a gap in the euler angle data of about 5 hours between 19:00:00 >> and Apr 17, 2001 00:01:00. When the data continues, the step pattern >> is totally different (see the beginning of file /geod20/MGS/work2/ >> apr18_21.ftn81). The normal pattern seems to re-appear at around >> 01:00:00 on April 17 and continues until about 04:48:00. Then >> another new pattern appears! This pattern seems to continue >> for a while. >> >> Is this what we are suppose to expect? Unannounced changes >> and irregular patterns? >> >> Doug >> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From sami.asmar@jpl.nasa.gov Fri May 4 13:48 PDT 2001 Received: from eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov (eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.40]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA03751 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 13:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmar-nt (asmar-nt.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.111]) by eis-msg-012.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA04418; Fri, 4 May 2001 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010504134831.02862290@pop.jpl.nasa.gov> X-Sender: asmar@pop.jpl.nasa.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 13:48:31 -0700 To: Frank Lemoine , rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu, bruce.banerdt@jpl.nasa.gov From: Sami Asmar Subject: Contingency Mode and Solar Array Quaternion Cc: flemoine@geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov, dsmith@tharsis.gsfc.nasa.gov, zuber@tharsis.gsfc.nasa.gov, len@nova.stanford.edu, boris.semenov@jpl.nasa.gov, neumann@tharsis.gsfc.nasa.gov, drowland@helmert.gsfc.nasa.gov.hinson@nimbus.stanford.edu, aseel@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov In-Reply-To: <200105041255.MAA10265@geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 5222 Status: RO Hi Frank, I gave you some background to the changes the project was implementing to the solar arrays at the Radio Science Team meeting. Now, it turns out, they decided to change the angle of the arrays to get less sun (by 25 degrees). That took about a week to accomplish. As I write this, MGS is in a contingency mode, in case you have not heard. We will be losing occultation data due to the low SNR from the LGA, so expect a degradation in gravity data as well. The Project chose to be stay in this mode for the weekend after initial attempts with the sequence was not successful. The solar array issues will be revisited next week and they may be changed again... that may have been the cause of the contingency mode - we don't know. Sorry that this is not too convenient for data analysis but we can't really complain either as the Project has to do what they need to do. We were commenting yesterday at the PSG that the environment is different in the extended mission. The priorities are to keep the spacecraft working through 2004. At best, the Project will let us know in advance about their plans for the solar array, but we have to keep our eyes open and expect to do more labor-intensive modelling. Thanks Sami At 12:55 PM 5/4/2001 GMT, Frank Lemoine wrote: > Gentlemen: > I forward to you a problem below describing an important > issue with the solar array quaternions. We routinely must > fill in for gaps and have developed a procedure for this. > Starting on April 17, though, we noticed significant > and numerous changes in how the solar array was being > oriented from orbit to orbit. For a few days at least, > it is hard to see a consistent pattern. We must fill > in the gaps, since we must model the motion of the solar arrays > accurately (they have a combined surface area of 16 m**2, so we > won't get the nonconservative force modelling correct if we > don't model the solar array motion properly). > Can you advise if the pattern that began on April 20 will > continue for some time? Or will there be more joy-sticking > of the solar arrays? > I point out that mismodelling the nonconservative forces will > degrade our MOLA POD quality and ultimately could alias > into or contaminate into any estimates of K2, which we very much > want to try to get. > > Another way to solve this problem is to fill the gaps in the > solar array c-kernels - which would also simplify our life > immensely. As you can see from the list below, the gaps > can be quite large - sometimes several orbits in duration. > > Thanks for any suggestions you might have, > > Frank Lemoine > >> >> Dear Frank, >> I have been having extreme difficulty in filling >> in the data gaps in the solar arrary quaternions. Everything >> seemed to be in order for March 14-31. During that time, >> the orbits alternated between what you called regime I and >> regime II. >> However, on April 1, 2001 at 00:00:00, the pattern >> suddenly switched to what I call "1 2 2" - a cycle of >> three orbits with patterns different than your I & II. >> This continued until April 16 at about 17:00:00 when >> there was an interruption. >> Beginning on April 17 at 00:00:00, the pattern changed >> again to what I call "A B C", a cycle of 3 orbits with 3 >> different patterns. In the previous cases, only Euler >> angle 2 changed. However, in the "A B C" patterns, all >> 3 euler angles change with mean anomaly. >> Then on April 20 at about 16:53:00, the pattern >> changed again to what I call "D D E". This pattern >> continues until at least Apr 29 00:00:00, which is >> the last time point that I have data for at the moment. >> Can you tell me how long this "D D E" pattern >> will continue? If the patterns keep changing, it will >> be very labor intensive to fill in the gaps in the >> quaternion data as a new interpolation subroutine has >> to be determined for each pattern (I have not written >> any subroutines for A B C D or E yet.). >> Typically, Euler angle #2 remains constant for a time, >> then ramps to a new value where it remains constant for another >> period of time. Each of these times of constant value are called >> a "step". In March, for each orbit, there was a 4 step repeating >> pattern (Euler angle #2 changed 4 different times per orbit). >> Beginning on April 1, it has been a 3 step repeating pattern >> per orbit. (This was confirmed by Sami at the Radio Science >> Meeting on April 17.) Thus, in order to make an interpolation >> subroutine, the flat step times and values and the ramp transition >> times between the steps must be determined for each of the lettered >> (A B C D E) patterns. For April, Euler angle #2's three step >> values are -69 deg, -5 deg, and +64 deg. Euler angle #1 has values >> of 150 deg, 90 deg, and 330 deg. Euler angle #3 is mostly 0 but >> also have values of 90 and 180 deg. >> Attached is list of the gaps in the quaterion data from >> March 14 - April 28. The longest gap is about 300 min on April 16. >> The smallest time gap noted by the gap checking program is 5 min. >> >> Doug >> GAP in min >> YPLUS SA GAP: 2001 MAR 14 03:18:30.0004 2001 MAR 14 03:24:05.0004 5.58 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From flemoine@geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov Mon May 21 14:04 PDT 2001 Received: from geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov (geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.107.54]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA19859 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from flemoine@localhost) by geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA22576 for rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:04:37 GMT From: Frank Lemoine Message-Id: <200105212104.VAA22576@geodesy2.gsfc.nasa.gov> Subject: ISA Z71620 submitted (jumps in Doppler - S/C Pert?) (forwarded) To: rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:04:31 GMT X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 212.4] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 2323 Status: RO > > Here is info on an ISA I just submitted, in case you are interested. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Stuart Demcak | Mars Global Surveyor (MGS), Navigation Team > Stuart.Demcak@jpl.nasa.gov | Jet Propulsion Laboratory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:28:44 -0700 (PDT) > From: Stuart Demcak > Reply-To: stuart@zeus.jpl.nasa.gov > To: stuart (Stuart Demcak), esposito (Pat Esposito), ejg (Eric J. Graat), > dbaird (Darren Baird) > Cc: Dave.F.Eckart@lmco.com, Stuart.R.Spath@lmco.com > Subject: ISA Z71620 submitted (jumps in Doppler - S/C Pert?) > > ISA Z71620 has been submitted: > > Examining the Doppler data, a small perturbation seems to be occurring on > the spacecraft soon after it comes out of the HGA beta rewind ("blackout") > period after periapsis. This perturbation seems to occur about 5 minutes > after the solar array orientation change around this time. For example, a > jump of approximately +.007-.01 Hz is seen in the 2-way Doppler for orbits > 9759-9760. Estimating for an impulsive maneuver at these "jumps" in these > three orbits give delta-V magnitudes of .63 mm/s, .71 mm/s and .33 mm/s. > These maneuvers were placed at the following epochs (ET, SCET): > '14-MAY-2001 12:41:38.000' $ ET > '14-MAY-2001 14:39:48.000' $ ET > '14-MAY-2001 16:41:32.000' $ ET > > I know that this "jump" effect had been seen all the way back on 4/17/01, > and may have occurred even earlier. Back at this time, these jumps in the > Doppler (after the beta rewind) occurred infrequently. However, there > frequency seemed to increase with time. I can not say for sure whether > this Doppler jump (perturbation) currently occurs in every orbit. However, > if it does not, it certainly occurs in almost every orbit. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Stuart Demcak | Mars Global Surveyor (MGS), Navigation Team > Stuart.Demcak@jpl.nasa.gov | Jet Propulsion Laboratory > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From joe@neptune.stanford.edu Mon Dec 10 16:58 PST 2001 Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (neptune [171.64.90.149]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06281 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:58:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from joe@localhost) by neptune.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA19814; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:55:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on Solaris X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200112110027.QAA04664@magellan.stanford.edu> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:55:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: joe@neptune.stanford.edu From: Joe Twicken To: joe@nova.stanford.edu, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu, hinson@nova.stanford.edu Subject: RE: ODR Notice: /users/z14/procODR/13442334 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 1385 Status: RO (1) Reprocessed with Goddard trajectory (2) There was no HGA motion compensation for the 11070137.ODR recording On 11-Dec-01 Joe Twicken 723-3597 wrote: > 11070137.ODR p 65XRXIR1R202 65XRXIC1XX02 65XR1IF1S102 65XR1IS1T102 > 65XR1IS1T202 65XR1IS1T302 65XR1IS1T402 65XR1IS1T502 > 11070335.ODR p 65XRXIR1R202 65XRXIC1XX02 65XR1IF1S102 65XR1IS1T102 > 65XR1IS1T202 65XR1IS1T302 65XR1IS1T402 65XR1IS1T502 > 11070533.ODR p 65XRXIR1R202 65XRXIC1XX02 65XR1IF1S102 65XR1IS1T102 > 65XR1IS1T202 65XR1IS1T302 65XR1IS1T402 65XR1IS1T502 > 11070731.ODR p 65XRXIR1R202 65XRXIC1XX02 65XR1IF1S102 65XR1IS1T102 > 65XR1IS1T202 65XR1IS1T302 65XR1IS1T402 65XR1IS1T502 > 11070928.ODR p 15XRXIR1R202 15XRXIC1XX02 15XR1IF1S102 15XR1IS1T102 > 15XR1IS1T202 15XR1IS1T302 15XR1IS1T402 15XR1IS1T502 > 11071126.ODR p 15XRXIR1R202 15XRXIC1XX02 15XR1IF1S102 15XR1IS1T102 > 15XR1IS1T202 15XR1IS1T302 15XR1IS1T402 15XR1IS1T502 > 11071324.ODR p 34XRXIR1R202 34XRXIC1XX02 34XR1IF1S102 34XR1IS1T102 > 34XR1IS1T202 34XR1IS1T302 34XR1IS1T402 34XR1IS1T502 > 11071522.ODR p 34XRXIR1R202 34XRXIC1XX02 34XR1IF1S102 34XR1IS1T102 > 34XR1IS1T202 34XR1IS1T302 34XR1IS1T402 34XR1IS1T502 > 11071719.ODR p 34XRXIR1R202 34XRXIC1XX02 34XR1IF1S102 34XR1IS1T102 > 34XR1IS1T202 34XR1IS1T302 34XR1IS1T402 34XR1IS1T502 > 11071917.ODR p 34XRXIR1R202 34XRXIC1XX02 34XR1IF1S102 34XR1IS1T102 > 34XR1IS1T202 34XR1IS1T302 34XR1IS1T402 34XR1IS1T502 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From joe@nova.stanford.edu Thu May 2 16:22:28 2002 Received: from nova.Stanford.EDU (nova [171.64.90.123]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g42NMRt19029 for ; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (neptune.Stanford.EDU [171.64.90.149]) by nova.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24845; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (joe@localhost) by neptune.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g42NKpl10326; Thu, 2 May 2002 16:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205022320.g42NKpl10326@neptune.Stanford.EDU> X-Authentication-Warning: neptune.Stanford.EDU: joe owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 From: Joe Twicken To: hinson@nova.stanford.edu, joe@nova.stanford.edu, rsimpson@nova.stanford.edu Subject: Re: ODR Notice: /users/z14/procODR/21222250 In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 2002 16:20:17 PDT." <200205022320.g42NKHL18974@magellan.stanford.edu> References: <200205022320.g42NKHL18974@magellan.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:20:51 -0700 Content-Length: 1306 Status: RO (1) Reprocessed with Goddard trajectory (2) There was no HGA motion compensation for these recordings >11070137.ODR p 65XRXIR1R203 65XRXIC1XX03 65XR1IF1S103 65XR1IS1T103 65XR1IS1T203 65XR1IS1T303 65XR1IS1T403 65XR1IS1T503 >11070335.ODR p 65XRXIR1R203 65XRXIC1XX03 65XR1IF1S103 65XR1IS1T103 65XR1IS1T203 65XR1IS1T303 65XR1IS1T403 65XR1IS1T503 >11070533.ODR p 65XRXIR1R203 65XRXIC1XX03 65XR1IF1S103 65XR1IS1T103 65XR1IS1T203 65XR1IS1T303 65XR1IS1T403 65XR1IS1T503 >11070731.ODR p 65XRXIR1R203 65XRXIC1XX03 65XR1IF1S103 65XR1IS1T103 65XR1IS1T203 65XR1IS1T303 65XR1IS1T403 65XR1IS1T503 >11070928.ODR p 15XRXIR1R203 15XRXIC1XX03 15XR1IF1S103 15XR1IS1T103 15XR1IS1T203 15XR1IS1T303 15XR1IS1T403 15XR1IS1T503 >11071126.ODR p 15XRXIR1R203 15XRXIC1XX03 15XR1IF1S103 15XR1IS1T103 15XR1IS1T203 15XR1IS1T303 15XR1IS1T403 15XR1IS1T503 >11071324.ODR p 34XRXIR1R203 34XRXIC1XX03 34XR1IF1S103 34XR1IS1T103 34XR1IS1T203 34XR1IS1T303 34XR1IS1T403 34XR1IS1T503 >11071522.ODR p 34XRXIR1R203 34XRXIC1XX03 34XR1IF1S103 34XR1IS1T103 34XR1IS1T203 34XR1IS1T303 34XR1IS1T403 34XR1IS1T503 >11071719.ODR p 34XRXIR1R203 34XRXIC1XX03 34XR1IF1S103 34XR1IS1T103 34XR1IS1T203 34XR1IS1T303 34XR1IS1T403 34XR1IS1T503 >11071917.ODR p 34XRXIR1R203 34XRXIC1XX03 34XR1IF1S103 34XR1IS1T103 34XR1IS1T203 34XR1IS1T303 34XR1IS1T403 34XR1IS1T503