PDS_VERSION_ID = PDS3 RECORD_TYPE = STREAM OBJECT = TEXT PUBLICATION_DATE = 2007-07-31 NOTE = " E-mail and other messages concerning MGS Radio Science on or about 2002/038." END_OBJECT = TEXT END From aseel@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov Wed Feb 6 15:04:21 2002 Received: from godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.120]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g16N4L526615 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:04:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA17866 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:04:21 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200202062304.PAA17866@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:04:20 -0800 (PST) From: Aseel Anabtawi Reply-To: Aseel Anabtawi Subject: fgain Values To: rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: n3bLnzsDQWFuwbdeOIwyQg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Length: 406 Status: O Hello, I'm thinking of reducing the fgain value for the 34-m by 1. It's been at 58 since we started data collection, and Andre suggests setting the fgain value to 3-5 dBs higher than the SNR. SNR has been between 50-54 dB for the 34-m, so I think we'd be risking clipping if we use 57 for fgain. What do you think? If you feel more comfortable with 58, I'll just keep it at 58. Regards, Aseel -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Wed Feb 6 15:52:44 2002 Received: (from rsimpson@localhost) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g16Nqh400264; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:52:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:52:43 -0800 (PST) From: Dick Simpson 723-3525 Message-Id: <200202062352.g16Nqh400264@magellan.stanford.edu> To: aseel@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Subject: Re: fgain Values Content-Length: 506 >I'm thinking of reducing the fgain value for the 34-m by 1. >It's been at 58 since we started data collection, and Andre >suggests setting the fgain value to 3-5 dBs higher than the >SNR. SNR has been between 50-54 dB for the 34-m, so I think >we'd be risking clipping if we use 57 for fgain. What do you >think? If you feel more comfortable with 58, I'll just keep >it at 58. I believe we can afford to increase the power in the sample values by 2 dB. I guess that means reducing FGAIN by 2. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From aseel@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 7 02:55:20 2002 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g17AtK524254; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 02:55:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id CAA24666; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 02:55:21 -0800 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma024601; Thu, 7 Feb 02 02:55:02 -0800 Received: from rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.22]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA20775; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 02:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from aseel@localhost) by rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id KAA11523; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:55:01 GMT Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:55:01 GMT From: aseel anabtawi Message-Id: <200202071055.KAA11523@rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> To: aseel.anabtawi@jpl.nasa.gov, data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.stanford.edu, kusza@magellan.stanford.edu, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 1376 Status: RO X-Status: DSS: 45 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13045 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-06:01:00 End Record: 2002/038-06:10:00 DSS: 45 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13046 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-06:38:00 End Record: 2002/038-06:47:00 DSS: 45 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13046 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-07:59:00 End Record: 2002/038-08:08:00 DSS: 45 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13047 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-08:36:00 End Record: 2002/038-08:45:00 DSS: 45 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13047 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-09:57:00 End Record: 2002/038-10:5:00 DSS: 45 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13048 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-10:34:00 End Record: 2002/038-10:43:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From aseel@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 7 13:25:50 2002 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g17LPo503260; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:25:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id NAA20050; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:25:50 -0800 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma019642; Thu, 7 Feb 02 13:25:01 -0800 Received: from rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.22]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29111; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: (from aseel@localhost) by rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id VAA12190; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:25:01 GMT Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:25:01 GMT From: aseel anabtawi Message-Id: <200202072125.VAA12190@rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> To: aseel.anabtawi@jpl.nasa.gov, data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.stanford.edu, kusza@magellan.stanford.edu, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 2299 Status: RO X-Status: DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13048 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-11:54:00 End Record: 2002/038-12:03:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13049 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-12:32:00 End Record: 2002/038-12:41:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13049 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-13:52:00 End Record: 2002/038-14:01:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13050 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-14:29:00 End Record: 2002/038-14:38:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13050 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-15:50:00 End Record: 2002/038-15:59:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13051 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-16:27:00 End Record: 2002/038-16:36:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13051 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-17:48:00 End Record: 2002/038-17:56:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13052 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-18:25:00 End Record: 2002/038-18:34:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13052 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-19:45:00 End Record: 2002/038-19:54:00 DSS: 65 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13053 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-20:23:00 End Record: 2002/038-20:32:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From aseel@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 7 17:20:55 2002 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g181Kt527759; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:20:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id RAA13686; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:20:55 -0800 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma013241; Thu, 7 Feb 02 17:20:01 -0800 Received: from rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.22]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02791; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from aseel@localhost) by rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id BAA12493; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:20:01 GMT Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:20:01 GMT From: aseel anabtawi Message-Id: <200202080120.BAA12493@rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> To: aseel.anabtawi@jpl.nasa.gov, data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.stanford.edu, kusza@magellan.stanford.edu, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 919 Status: RO X-Status: DSS: 25 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13053 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-21:43:00 End Record: 2002/038-21:52:00 DSS: 25 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13054 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-22:20:00 End Record: 2002/038-22:29:00 DSS: 25 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13054 Occultation Sense: i SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/038-23:41:00 End Record: 2002/038-23:50:00 DSS: 25 RSR: RSR2A Subchannel: 1 Orbit Number: 13055 Occultation Sense: e SOE: mm158b.16.tsoe Ground Mode: 1 Uplink Station: -- Sampling Rate: 2K Bit Resolution: 16 Begin Record: 2002/039-00:18:00 End Record: 2002/039-00:27:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From aseel@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 7 13:34:53 2002 Received: from thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.90.10]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g17LYq503459; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:34:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov; id NAA24435; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:34:52 -0800 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov(137.228.96.12) by thorn.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma023940; Thu, 7 Feb 02 13:33:52 -0800 Received: from rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.22]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29180; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (from aseel@localhost) by rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id VAA12221; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:33:52 GMT Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:33:52 GMT From: aseel anabtawi Message-Id: <200202072133.VAA12221@rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov> To: Kusza@magellan.stanford.edu, aseel.anabtawi@jpl.nasa.gov, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Subject: 2002/038 at DSS 65 Content-Length: 2678 Status: RO X-Status: Hello, The first seven measurements (13048i-13051i) were lost because RSR2A failed to verify. The same problem actually occurred on the previous day (DOY 037, DSS 65, BOT 1130), but I caught the problem early enough and restarted the script. The RSR verified OK the second time around. This time I did not catch the problem until just before the 8th measurement (13052e). To save some time I tried to verify again (without starting the script all over again), and it worked OK. However, that wasn't fast enough to capture egress. The first data record was at 18:27:18, and egress had occurred about a minute earlier. The RSR group are aware of the problem. This is the same problem that caused data loss over DSS-34 on DOY 033. The are looking into it. Below is Andre's response to one of my emails. Regards, Aseel >From: Andre Jongeling >To: aseel anabtawi >Subject: Re: RSR2A at SPC-60 >Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:07:23 -0800 > >Hello Aseel, > >I just checked the status of the other RSRs and VSRs at SPC40 and >SPC60. >They all >showed signs of the 5MHz signal dropping out at some point. A 5MHz >dropout can >cause the error messages you listed. Quiting and restarting is the >correct response. If you >are running both the A and B sides of an RSR you should quit both >sides >before restarting. >The only way to find the source of this problem is to have someone >at >the station trace the >5MHz signal back through the system while it is failing. I'm going >to >have the outputs of the >FSP 5MHz distribution amp checked, I'll let you know if we find >anything. > >Andre > >aseel anabtawi wrote: > >>Hello Andre, >> >>RSR2A at SPC-60 failed to verify today (DOY 037) due to the same >>reason RSR2A at SPC-40 failed to verify last Friday (DOY 033): >> >>02/037 09:31:11> EVT 30 WARNING: [1] vfy FAILED : COULD NOT >>CONFIGURE DIG DDC >>02/037 09:31:12> EVT 10 CRITICAL: DDC 1PPS NOT PRESENT >>02/037 09:31:12> EVT 11 CRITICAL: DDC MSEC NOT PRESENT >> >>The log file is RSR2A_log.037-093006. >> >>You've already explained the casue of the problem, but I think >>that you said that you need to see it happen to debug the problem. >>This is the first time the I see it happen at SPC-60 (it was also >>the first at SPC-40 on DOY 033). I quit and restarted the script, >>and the RSR verified OK the second time around. Is this a problem >>that I should be watching out for? And is the correct action to >>quit and restart? Please let me know if there's anything that I >>can >>do to help debug the problem if I see it happen again. >> >>Thank you. >> >>Regards, >>Aseel -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From aseel@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 7 21:18:46 2002 Received: from godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.120]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g185Ik502517; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:18:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA24272; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:18:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200202080518.VAA24272@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:18:46 -0800 (PST) From: Aseel Anabtawi Reply-To: Aseel Anabtawi Subject: Re: RSR2A at SPC-60 To: rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu, Kusza@magellan.stanford.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY=Caravan_of_Camels_674_000 X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Content-Length: 3844 Status: RO X-Status: --Caravan_of_Camels_674_000 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: cOTXdFp4/6/jdUqI10hDng== ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 17:00:37 -0800 From: Andre Jongeling To: aseel anabtawi CC: Sami.W.Asmar@jpl.nasa.gov, aseel@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov, lawhite@jpl.nasa.gov Subject: Re: RSR2A at SPC-60 Hello, A potential source of the 5MHz dropouts at MDSCC has been identified and resolved, see below... I have also made a few small changes to the RSR software that should help. When the new software is installed the RSR should recover from dropouts on its own. Recently, we haven't had any alarms in the CRG regarding the reference signal. Investigating the reported problem , has been finally traced to a loose connection of the 5MHz signal , input A of the A8 Distribution Amplifier in rack 6421/FSP-001. Along this week has taken place the movement out of some old radioscience racks, adjacent to FSP, and probably the cable was moved during the maneuver causing the loss of the signal. Once the connection has been properly tightened I hope the problem is cleared. Best regards, Juan Sanchez Colmenarejo aseel anabtawi wrote: >Hello Andre, > >"Verify" failed again last night on RSR2A at SPC-60. This time I did >not catch it early enough and seven measurements were lost. In a hurry >to capture the 8th measurement, I did not quit and restart the script, >but instead just tried to verify again and it worked. > >The log file is RSR2A_log.038-093007. The error messages are again: >02/038 09:31:09> EVT 30 WARNING: [1] vfy FAILED : COULD NOT CONFIGURE DIG DDC >02/038 09:31:10> EVT 10 CRITICAL: DDC 1PPS NOT PRESENT >02/038 09:31:10> EVT 11 CRITICAL: DDC MSEC NOT PRESENT > >Regards, >Aseel > ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- --Caravan_of_Camels_674_000 Content-Type: TEXT/html; name=NoName; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: NoName Content-MD5: SY+5dLh5B6dWbU/j0Y9hlg== Hello,

A potential source of the 5MHz dropouts at MDSCC has been identified and resolved, see below...
I have also made a few small changes to the RSR software that should help.  When the new software
is installed the RSR should recover from dropouts on its own.

 Recently, we haven't had  any alarms in the CRG regarding the
reference signal.

 Investigating the reported problem ,  has been  finally traced to a
loose connection of the 5MHz signal , input A of the  A8  Distribution
Amplifier  in rack 6421/FSP-001.
 Along this week has  taken place the movement out  of some old
radioscience racks, adjacent to FSP, and probably the cable  was moved
during the maneuver causing the loss of the signal.

 Once the connection has been properly tightened I hope the problem
is cleared.

 Best regards,
 Juan Sanchez Colmenarejo

aseel anabtawi wrote:
Hello Andre,

"Verify" failed again last night on RSR2A at SPC-60.  This time I did
not catch it early enough and seven measurements were lost. In a hurry
to capture the 8th measurement, I did not quit and restart the script, <

--Caravan_of_Camels_674_000-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From aseel@airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 9 05:34:07 2002 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 20:54:48 GMT From: aseel anabtawi To: Kusza@magellan.stanford.edu, aseel@rsops2.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Subject: Re: 038 DSS 65 Hello Kerri, Sorry about that. When I did a "verify" the second time, the name of the data file changed, but the "play" was setup to playback the old data file. The data should be available now. I understand that the RSR stuff is new to you. If you don't mind, I'll try to give short explanations once in a while to make things clearer. Regards, Aseel >From: Kerri Kusza 3-3669 >To: aseel anabtawi >Subject: 038 DSS 65 >Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:02:50 +0000 (GMT) > > >Hi Aseel, > >I understand that the RSR failed to verify for DSS 65 on occultations >13048i through 13051i and that order was restored in the middle of 13052e. > >So I did not expect queries for 13048i through 13052e to succeed. > >I was hoping, however, to retrieve 13052i (start time 19:45:00) and 13053e >(start time 20:23:00) from DSS 65, but I was unable to retrieve them. > >Queries on following occultations from DSS 25 are fine. > > >Kerri -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From joe@neptune.stanford.edu Tue Feb 19 11:17:45 2002 Received: from nova.Stanford.EDU (nova [171.64.90.123]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1JJHi505612 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:17:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (neptune.Stanford.EDU [171.64.90.149]) by nova.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18361; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:17:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (joe@localhost) by neptune.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1JJH6p01467; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:17:06 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200202191917.g1JJH6p01467@neptune.Stanford.EDU> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 From: Joe Twicken To: hinson@nova.stanford.edu, joe@nova.stanford.edu, rsimpson@nova.stanford.edu Subject: Re: RSR Notice: /users/z08/procRSR/20470157 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:35:39 PST." <200202160235.g1G2Zde19826@magellan.stanford.edu> References: <200202160235.g1G2Zde19826@magellan.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:17:06 -0800 Sender: joe@neptune.stanford.edu Content-Length: 2105 Status: RO (1) There was no HGA motion compensation for these recordings >20380008.RSR p 15XR1IRXN101 15XR1IC1XX01 15XR1IF1S101 15XR1IS1T101 15XR1IS1T201 15XR1IS1T301 15XR1IS1T401 15XR1IS1T501 >20380045.RSR p 15XR1ERXN101 15XR1EC1XX01 15XR1EF1S101 15XR1ES1T101 15XR1ES1T201 15XR1ES1T301 15XR1ES1T401 15XR1ES1T501 >20380206.RSR p 15XR1IRXN101 15XR1IC1XX01 15XR1IF1S101 15XR1IS1T101 15XR1IS1T201 15XR1IS1T301 15XR1IS1T401 15XR1IS1T501 >20380243.RSR p 15XR1ERXN101 15XR1EC1XX01 15XR1EF1S101 15XR1ES1T101 15XR1ES1T201 15XR1ES1T301 15XR1ES1T401 15XR1ES1T501 >20380403.RSR p 15XR1IRXN101 15XR1IC1XX01 15XR1IF1S101 15XR1IS1T101 15XR1IS1T201 15XR1IS1T301 15XR1IS1T401 15XR1IS1T501 >20380441.RSR p 15XR1ERXN101 15XR1EC1XX01 15XR1EF1S101 15XR1ES1T101 15XR1ES1T201 15XR1ES1T301 15XR1ES1T401 15XR1ES1T501 >20380601.RSR p 45XR1IRXN101 45XR1IC1XX01 45XR1IF1S101 45XR1IS1T101 45XR1IS1T201 45XR1IS1T301 45XR1IS1T401 45XR1IS1T501 >20380638.RSR p 45XR1ERXN101 45XR1EC1XX01 45XR1EF1S101 45XR1ES1T101 45XR1ES1T201 45XR1ES1T301 45XR1ES1T401 45XR1ES1T501 >20380759.RSR p 45XR1IRXN101 45XR1IC1XX01 45XR1IF1S101 45XR1IS1T101 45XR1IS1T201 45XR1IS1T301 45XR1IS1T401 45XR1IS1T501 >20380836.RSR p 45XR1ERXN101 45XR1EC1XX01 45XR1EF1S101 45XR1ES1T101 45XR1ES1T201 45XR1ES1T301 45XR1ES1T401 45XR1ES1T501 >20380957.RSR p 45XR1IRXN101 45XR1IC1XX01 45XR1IF1S101 45XR1IS1T101 45XR1IS1T201 45XR1IS1T301 45XR1IS1T401 45XR1IS1T501 >20381034.RSR p 45XR1ERXN101 45XR1EC1XX01 45XR1EF1S101 45XR1ES1T101 45XR1ES1T201 45XR1ES1T301 45XR1ES1T401 45XR1ES1T501 >20381945.RSR p 65XR1IRXN101 65XR1IC1XX01 65XR1IF1S101 65XR1IS1T101 65XR1IS1T201 65XR1IS1T301 65XR1IS1T401 65XR1IS1T501 >20382023.RSR p 65XR1ERXN101 65XR1EC1XX01 65XR1EF1S101 65XR1ES1T101 65XR1ES1T201 65XR1ES1T301 65XR1ES1T401 65XR1ES1T501 >20382143.RSR p 25XR1IRXN101 25XR1IC1XX01 25XR1IF1S101 25XR1IS1T101 25XR1IS1T201 25XR1IS1T301 25XR1IS1T401 25XR1IS1T501 >20382220.RSR p 25XR1ERXN101 25XR1EC1XX01 25XR1EF1S101 25XR1ES1T101 25XR1ES1T201 25XR1ES1T301 25XR1ES1T401 25XR1ES1T501 >20382341.RSR p 25XR1IRXN101 25XR1IC1XX01 25XR1IF1S101 25XR1IS1T101 25XR1IS1T201 25XR1IS1T301 25XR1IS1T401 25XR1IS1T501 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From joe@nova.stanford.edu Tue Oct 22 21:32:32 2002 Received: from nova.Stanford.EDU (nova [171.64.90.123]) by magellan.stanford.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9N4WVs25001 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (neptune.Stanford.EDU [171.64.90.149]) by nova.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA27822; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (joe@localhost) by neptune.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9N4WU514625; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200210230432.g9N4WU514625@neptune.Stanford.EDU> X-Authentication-Warning: neptune.Stanford.EDU: joe owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Joe Twicken To: hinson@nova.stanford.edu, joe@nova.stanford.edu, rsimpson@nova.stanford.edu Subject: Re: RSR Notice: /users/z07/procRSR/22951802 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:12:12 PDT." <200210221912.g9MJCCE24097@magellan.stanford.edu> References: <200210221912.g9MJCCE24097@magellan.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:32:30 -0700 Content-Length: 2083 Status: RO (1) Reprocessed with Goddard trajectory >20380008.RSR p 15XR1IRXN102 15XR1IC1XX02 15XR1IF1S102 15XR1IS1T102 15XR1IS1T202 15XR1IS1T302 15XR1IS1T402 15XR1IS1T502 >20380045.RSR p 15XR1ERXN102 15XR1EC1XX02 15XR1EF1S102 15XR1ES1T102 15XR1ES1T202 15XR1ES1T302 15XR1ES1T402 15XR1ES1T502 >20380206.RSR p 15XR1IRXN102 15XR1IC1XX02 15XR1IF1S102 15XR1IS1T102 15XR1IS1T202 15XR1IS1T302 15XR1IS1T402 15XR1IS1T502 >20380243.RSR p 15XR1ERXN102 15XR1EC1XX02 15XR1EF1S102 15XR1ES1T102 15XR1ES1T202 15XR1ES1T302 15XR1ES1T402 15XR1ES1T502 >20380403.RSR p 15XR1IRXN102 15XR1IC1XX02 15XR1IF1S102 15XR1IS1T102 15XR1IS1T202 15XR1IS1T302 15XR1IS1T402 15XR1IS1T502 >20380441.RSR p 15XR1ERXN102 15XR1EC1XX02 15XR1EF1S102 15XR1ES1T102 15XR1ES1T202 15XR1ES1T302 15XR1ES1T402 15XR1ES1T502 >20380601.RSR p 45XR1IRXN102 45XR1IC1XX02 45XR1IF1S102 45XR1IS1T102 45XR1IS1T202 45XR1IS1T302 45XR1IS1T402 45XR1IS1T502 >20380638.RSR p 45XR1ERXN102 45XR1EC1XX02 45XR1EF1S102 45XR1ES1T102 45XR1ES1T202 45XR1ES1T302 45XR1ES1T402 45XR1ES1T502 >20380759.RSR p 45XR1IRXN102 45XR1IC1XX02 45XR1IF1S102 45XR1IS1T102 45XR1IS1T202 45XR1IS1T302 45XR1IS1T402 45XR1IS1T502 >20380836.RSR p 45XR1ERXN102 45XR1EC1XX02 45XR1EF1S102 45XR1ES1T102 45XR1ES1T202 45XR1ES1T302 45XR1ES1T402 45XR1ES1T502 >20380957.RSR p 45XR1IRXN102 45XR1IC1XX02 45XR1IF1S102 45XR1IS1T102 45XR1IS1T202 45XR1IS1T302 45XR1IS1T402 45XR1IS1T502 >20381034.RSR p 45XR1ERXN102 45XR1EC1XX02 45XR1EF1S102 45XR1ES1T102 45XR1ES1T202 45XR1ES1T302 45XR1ES1T402 45XR1ES1T502 >20381945.RSR p 65XR1IRXN102 65XR1IC1XX02 65XR1IF1S102 65XR1IS1T102 65XR1IS1T202 65XR1IS1T302 65XR1IS1T402 65XR1IS1T502 >20382023.RSR p 65XR1ERXN102 65XR1EC1XX02 65XR1EF1S102 65XR1ES1T102 65XR1ES1T202 65XR1ES1T302 65XR1ES1T402 65XR1ES1T502 >20382143.RSR p 25XR1IRXN102 25XR1IC1XX02 25XR1IF1S102 25XR1IS1T102 25XR1IS1T202 25XR1IS1T302 25XR1IS1T402 25XR1IS1T502 >20382220.RSR p 25XR1ERXN102 25XR1EC1XX02 25XR1EF1S102 25XR1ES1T102 25XR1ES1T202 25XR1ES1T302 25XR1ES1T402 25XR1ES1T502 >20382341.RSR p 25XR1IRXN102 25XR1IC1XX02 25XR1IF1S102 25XR1IS1T102 25XR1IS1T202 25XR1IS1T302 25XR1IS1T402 25XR1IS1T502