PDS_VERSION_ID = PDS3 RECORD_TYPE = STREAM OBJECT = TEXT PUBLICATION_DATE = 2007-07-29 NOTE = " E-mail and other messages concerning MGS Radio Science on or about 1999/051." END_OBJECT = TEXT END From ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 20 07:02:55 1999 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.96.12]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id HAA01680; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:02:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id HAA20069; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA03931; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:02:43 GMT Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:02:43 GMT From: ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (Patricia Priest 264-859) Message-Id: <199902201502.PAA03931@mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov> To: data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.Stanford.EDU, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 1345 Status: RO DSS: 34 Orbit: 1470e SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/15:00:00 End Record: 050/15:10:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1470i SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/16:09:00 End Record: 050/16:23:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1471e SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/16:58:00 End Record: 050/17:08:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1471i SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/18:07:00 End Record: 050/18:21:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1472e SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/18:57:00 End Record: 050/19:07:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1472i SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/20:06:00 End Record: 050/20:20:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1473e SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/20:55:00 End Record: 050/21:05:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1473i SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/22:04:00 End Record: 050/22:18:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1474e SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 050/22:54:00 End Record: 050/23:04:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1474i SOE: p1455a.01.tsoe Begin Record: 051/00:02:00 End Record: 051/00:16:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 20 07:04:32 1999 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.96.12]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id HAA01689; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:04:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id HAA20079; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA04014; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:04:28 GMT Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:04:28 GMT From: ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (Patricia Priest 264-859) Message-Id: <199902201504.PAA04014@mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov> To: data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.Stanford.EDU, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 1219 Status: RO DSS: 65 Orbit: 1475e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/00:51:59 End Record: 051/00:59:10 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1475i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/02:00:16 End Record: 051/02:15:16 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: 31.79 Elevation Angle: 25.211 Orbit: 1476e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/02:49:00 End Record: 051/02:57:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1476i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/03:57:00 End Record: 051/04:13:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1477e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/04:47:00 End Record: 051/04:55:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1477i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/05:55:00 End Record: 051/06:11:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1478e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/06:45:00 End Record: 051/06:53:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1478i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/07:53:00 End Record: 051/08:09:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1479e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/08:42:00 End Record: 051/08:50:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 20 07:08:10 1999 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.96.12]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id HAA01697; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id HAA20092; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA04105; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:07:46 GMT Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:07:46 GMT From: ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (Patricia Priest 264-859) Message-Id: <199902201507.PAA04105@mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov> To: data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.Stanford.EDU, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 409 Status: RO DSS: 14 Orbit: 1479i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/09:50:00 End Record: 051/10:06:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1480e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/10:40:00 End Record: 051/10:48:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1480i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/11:48:00 End Record: 051/12:04:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 20 07:09:41 1999 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.96.12]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id HAA01706; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:09:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id HAA20111; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 07:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA04195; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:10:11 GMT Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:10:11 GMT From: ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (Patricia Priest 264-859) Message-Id: <199902201510.PAA04195@mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov> To: data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.Stanford.EDU, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 159 Status: RO DSS: 15 Orbit: 1481e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/12:37:00 End Record: 051/12:46:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: 30.01 Elevation Angle: 41.888 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 20 16:23:21 1999 Received: from airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.96.12]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA02029; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:23:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov [137.228.136.10]) by airmail.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA22933; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id AAA07087; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:24:04 GMT Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:24:04 GMT From: ppriest@mmrs.fltops.jpl.nasa.gov (Patricia Priest 264-859) Message-Id: <199902210024.AAA07087@mmrs.jpl.nasa.gov> To: data@magellan.stanford.edu, joe@neptune.Stanford.EDU, rsimpson@magellan.stanford.edu Content-Length: 1383 Status: RO DSS: 45 Orbit: 1481i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/13:46:00 End Record: 051/14:02:00 Last Attenuation Change: 42 SNT: 35.43 Elevation Angle: 20.986 Orbit: 1482e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/14:35:00 End Record: 051/14:43:00 Last Attenuation Change:43 @14:32 SNT: 30.53 Elevation Angle: 33.047 Orbit: 1482i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/15:43:00 End Record: 051/15:59:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1483e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/16:33:00 End Record: 051/16:41:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1483i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/17:41:00 End Record: 051/17:57:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1484e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/18:30:00 End Record: 051/18:39:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1484i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/19:39:00 End Record: 051/19:55:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1485e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/20:28:00 End Record: 051/20:36:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1485i SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/21:36:00 End Record: 051/21:52:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: Orbit: 1486e SOE: p1474a.03.tsoe Begin Record: 051/22:26:00 End Record: 051/22:34:00 Last Attenuation Change: SNT: Elevation Angle: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From trish@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov Sat Feb 20 17:47:06 1999 Received: from godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.120]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA04686 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 17:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodan.jpl.nasa.gov (rodan.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.110]) by godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00332; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 17:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from 137.78.177.117 (trish-mac.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.117]) by rodan.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA01149; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 17:47:50 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902210147.RAA01149@rodan.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: 20 Feb 99 17:50:39 -0800 From: Trish Priest Subject: 1491i through 1492i To: Richard Simpson , Joe Twicken X-Mailer: QuickMail Pro 1.5.4 (Mac) X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: Trish Priest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-Ascii" Content-Length: 134 Status: RO Hello, These three measurements will be lost due to a gap in DSN coverage. Also, 1484i (051-19:39:00) may have a sawtooth. -Trish -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From trish@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 25 14:23:24 1999 Received: from godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.120]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA10930 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodan.jpl.nasa.gov (rodan.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.110]) by godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA19918 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from 137.78.177.117 (trish-mac.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.117]) by rodan.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA14600 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 14:24:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902252224.OAA14600@rodan.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: 25 Feb 99 14:27:10 -0800 From: Trish Priest Subject: Some mysteries solved To: Richard Simpson X-Mailer: QuickMail Pro 1.5.4 (Mac) X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: Trish Priest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-Ascii" Content-Length: 2200 Status: RO Hello, Dick, Below are some more explanations. DOY 050 DSS 65 I'm not sure about the low signal yet. Everything was set up correctly. The four which were lost -- the DSP seems to have fallen out of the link. This seems to happen at SPC 60 occassionally, but we have been here in the past. I will notify Sal. 1466e and 1467e suffered from the SPAR initialization failure problem, but the real problem was that the DSP no longer thought that it was in a link. 1467i and 1468i 050/10:12:00 and 12:10:00, respectively Suffer from no signal according to your health report. Scripts ran correctly; attenuation was fine; predicts seem fine; spacecraft should have been one-way. I have to look further. 1469e and 1469i DSS45 DSS45 antenna was going red at the time. The station reported large amplitude variations. We switched the DSP to DSS34. 1471i 050/18:08:00 Another SPAR initialization failure. This will be corrected automatically in the next version of remote ops. 1472e 050/18:57:00 This appears in the log, but I can't find a script. This may have been my fault. 1481i 051/13:46:00 DSS45 You reported this as the wrong filter. Actually there was too much attenuation. Would that explain what you saw? We set up for the wrong DSP at SPC 40. The attenuation settings are very different. 1486e 051/22:26:00 DSS45 You said that there were saturated A/Ds. Where the measurements previous to this one getting close to the edge? The attenuators were set correctly and the same for the entire pass. 1486i 051/23:35:00 DSS45 This was not a gap. It was scripted for DSS 45. I suspect another SPAR initialization problem, but I have to check. 052/09:21:00, 10:12:00, 11:19:00, DSN gap? Yes between 65 and 15 053/16:45:00 "Unknown event" about 2 minutes after ingress. Nothing odd in SOE for this time. This is still open, but it doesn't sound like it should be at the top of the stack. I think that this gets me up-to-date except for the ongoing mysteries. Tonight there will still be Y2k testing at SPC 10, so 1552i through 1554e will be lost. Otherwise, we will be collecting data as usual until I hear that they are going to try NADIR again. -Trish -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From rsimpson Thu Feb 25 15:05:26 1999 Received: (from rsimpson@localhost) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) id PAA11070; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:05:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:05:26 -0800 (PST) From: Dick Simpson 723-3525 Message-Id: <199902252305.PAA11070@magellan.Stanford.EDU> To: trish@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov Subject: Re: Some mysteries solved Cc: rsimpson Content-Length: 2900 Status: R >1481i 051/13:46:00 DSS45 >You reported this as the wrong filter. Actually there was too much >attenuation. Would that explain what you saw? We set up for the wrong >DSP at SPC 40. The attenuation settings are very different. Our software shows the 100 Hz filter being used. It's also true that the signal level is alomst 40 dB lower than it should be. Could easily be a combination of the two. If the filter set is different on the second DSP, that would explain our initial reaction. Bottom line is that this one won't make it into the literature about Mars. >1486e 051/22:26:00 DSS45 >You said that there were saturated A/Ds. Where the measurements previous >to this one getting close to the edge? The attenuators were set >correctly and the same for the entire pass. The immediate previous occultation was an ingress where our software hiccupped as though there were lost records; we don't have a power vs time plot. But the histogram of data sample values looks OK. (1485i). Before that, 1485e looks perfect. But 1484i is about 10 dB too low The histogram is very narrow, so I'm guessing the attenuators on 1484i were set 10 dB too high. Everything before that looks nominal until you get to 1481i. >053/16:45:00 >"Unknown event" about 2 minutes after ingress. >Nothing odd in SOE for this time. This is still open, but it doesn't >sound like it should be at the top of the stack. This looks like a ground problem -- something corrupting the input signal to the DSP, or maybe the DSP itself misbehaving. Since it's respectably after the ingress event, I would definitely put it at the bottom of the stack. >I think that this gets me up-to-date except for the ongoing mysteries. Good enough for me. Nice work. Thanks much. >Tonight there will still be Y2k testing at SPC 10, so 1552i through 1554e >will be lost. Otherwise, we will be collecting data as usual until I >hear that they are going to try NADIR again. Thanks for the alert. You have done a nice job dancing around all the NADIR changes so far. If this is going to be a RadioScience-only mission, we're in good hands. QUESTION: I have got out of the habit of including figures with the health reports. That's largely because I got some negative feedback from PDS on the way I was archiving them. Nothing too serious, but it was going to require more work to include them in the archive than I was prepared to invest. So I dropped them. But we're generating all kinds of figures; if there's anything you'd like to see, just holler. the FAX is only a few steps away -- or I could send you the PostScript files via e-mail as before. It's just going to be a hassle wrapping them with the health report -- unless we find something REALLY big. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From trish@godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov Thu Feb 25 19:16:24 1999 Received: from godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.120]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id TAA11976 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 19:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rodan.jpl.nasa.gov (rodan.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.110]) by godzilla.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA21327 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 19:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from 137.78.177.117 (trish-mac.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.177.117]) by rodan.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA15710 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 19:17:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199902260317.TAA15710@rodan.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: 25 Feb 99 19:20:11 -0800 From: Trish Priest Subject: Re: Some mysteries solved To: "Dick Simpson 723-3525" X-Mailer: QuickMail Pro 1.5.4 (Mac) X-Priority: 3 Reply-To: Trish Priest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-Ascii" Content-Length: 2740 Status: RO Reply to: Re: Some mysteries solved > >>1481i 051/13:46:00 DSS45 >>You reported this as the wrong filter. Actually there was too much >>attenuation. Would that explain what you saw? We set up for the wrong >>DSP at SPC 40. The attenuation settings are very different. > > Our software shows the 100 Hz filter being used. It's also true that > the signal level is alomst 40 dB lower than it should be. Could > easily be a combination of the two. If the filter set is different > on the second DSP, that would explain our initial reaction. Bottom > line is that this one won't make it into the literature about Mars. > This is very puzzling because every indication that we have is that the correct filter was used. It would actually be difficult for us to use the wrong filter. >>1486e 051/22:26:00 DSS45 >>You said that there were saturated A/Ds. Where the measurements previous >>to this one getting close to the edge? The attenuators were set >>correctly and the same for the entire pass. > > The immediate previous occultation was an ingress where our software > hiccupped as though there were lost records; we don't have a power vs > time plot. But the histogram of data sample values looks OK. (1485i). > > Before that, 1485e looks perfect. But 1484i is about 10 dB too low > The histogram is very narrow, so I'm guessing the attenuators on 1484i > were set 10 dB too high. Everything before that looks nominal until > you get to 1481i. > Thanks for the info. >QUESTION: I have got out of the habit of including figures with the > health reports. That's largely because I got some negative > feedback from PDS on the way I was archiving them. Nothing > too serious, but it was going to require more work to include > them in the archive than I was prepared to invest. So I > dropped them. But we're generating all kinds of figures; > if there's anything you'd like to see, just holler. the FAX > is only a few steps away -- or I could send you the PostScript > files via e-mail as before. It's just going to be a hassle > wrapping them with the health report -- unless we find something > REALLY big. Since I receive e-mail on my Mac, and I don't know how to print postscript files from a Mac, I prefer faxes. I would like to see some of the mysteries on paper. The one with the wrong filter. An example of the low signal at SPC 60 on DOY 050. If there is a good example of a recurring problem, it would be good to have a sample. Sal often wants to send an example to the station, so if you have a good example of the bad filter, that would be helpful. Thanks. -Trish -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From joe@nova.Stanford.EDU Sun Feb 28 15:06:42 1999 Received: from nova.Stanford.EDU (nova.Stanford.EDU [36.10.0.123]) by magellan.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA04718 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:06:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from neptune.Stanford.EDU (neptune.stanford.edu [36.10.0.149]) by nova.Stanford.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22432; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:07:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from joe@localhost) by neptune.Stanford.EDU (8.8.5/8.8.3) id PAA25078; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:07:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on Solaris X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199902282259.OAA04535@magellan.Stanford.EDU> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 15:07:38 -0800 (PST) Sender: joe@neptune.Stanford.EDU From: Joe Twicken To: hinson@nova.Stanford.EDU, rsimpson@nova.Stanford.EDU, joe@nova.Stanford.EDU Subject: RE: ODR Notice: /users/z12/procODR/90592254 Content-Length: 438 Status: RO The trajectories are now pretty good. The first one looks somewhat better than the second. I am curious whether these produce good profiles or not... On 28-Feb-99 Joe Twicken 723-3597 wrote: > 90512028.ODR p 45XRXER1R201 45XRXEC1XX01 45XR1EF1S101 45XR1ES1T101 > 45XR1ES1T201 45XR1ES1T301 45XR1ES1T401 45XR1ES1T501 > 90520023.ODR p 65XRXER1R201 65XRXEC1XX01 65XR1EF1S101 65XR1ES1T101 > 65XR1ES1T201 65XR1ES1T301 65XR1ES1T401 65XR1ES1T501